Another flaw in the theory favoring an adversarial system is that it presumes that everyone with a dispute actually wants to spend the money needed to support the adversary system. By its very nature, the adversary system is an extremely expensive way of resolving disputes because, to achieve equality of bargaining position, both sides must take every conceivable step to improve their positions. If one side does more than the other, the likelihood that a just result will be realized diminishes drastically. So both sides fight as hard as possible. Not only does this dramatically increase the costs of resolving the underlying disputes, it also dramatically increases the stresses imposed on parties who are forced to spend their energies attacking each other. No wonder even the winners leave court questioning whether justice has been done; after they have been ravaged financially and raked over the coals personally.
This is why I wrote my novel The Litigators – to bring to the forefront the enormous wastefulness of the American system of dispute resolution. If this topic interests you, I suggest you read the novel and then ask this question when you are done: Who won the lawsuit? The answer you give may surprise you.
Join me next week for What does it mean to “win” a lawsuit?
No comments:
Post a Comment