Sure, the economy is more important than same sex marriage, virtually everyone agrees with that. But there are no solutions to our economic woes that will get anyone elected or help anyone stay in power. To solve our long term economic woes, we either have to raise revenues (i.e. more taxes), reduce spending (i.e. cut funding to all the grand entitlement programs that got most of our national leaders elected in the first place), or, heaven forbid, a little of both. No matter which side a politician takes, he alienates half the American voters, and if he’s dumb enough to advocate the one solution most likely to do good, a little of each, then he alienates everyone. Taking a stand on the economy is simply bad politics, unless all one does is talk in absurdly vague generalities.
So, as it turns out, taking a stand on marriage is less risky. Most people do not care one way or the other how this issue is resolved because it has nothing whatsoever to do with their lives. Alienating one side really does not cost a politician many votes, but it does raise political contributions from those few rabid supporters on one side or the other. And that money of course is essential to funding the inevitable negative personal attacks on his opponent that for some mysterious reason actually influence voter decisions.
I know how I’m going to vote, but I won’t tell you. After all, what difference does it really make?
No comments:
Post a Comment