Step three in how to win a lawsuit: Define what you mean by "win"

This is not a silly question. If you have nothing more than a very vague idea about what you should expect to happen with your case, you have no way to know whether you’ve won or lost, no way to make an intelligent decision about whether to settle and for how much, and no way to know whether it’s worth the gamble of taking your case to a trial in front of a jury. What is your case worth? What is the best way to bring the case to a satisfactory resolution as quickly as possible and with as few legal expenses as possible? It’s your case, not your lawyer’s case, and you need to take control of it, participate in all the important decisions about the case, participate in all decisions about the costs that will be incurred in presenting your case, and participate in all discussions about the strategy and tactics that will be used and why. The last thing to do is to trust that your lawyer will just take care of everything for you.

If you want to see what happens when clients leave everything to their lawyers and do not participate in decisions affecting their cases, try reading my novel, The Litigators, available through my publisher, Scarletta Press, or Amazon (both in paperback and digital copies). Suffice it to say that lawyers have a very different definition of what it means to win a case than clients do. If you ask a lawyer to define a “win” you are likely to hear about some grand courtroom victory. If you ask clients to define what they consider to be a “win” you will almost never hear anything about a courtroom. Lawyers are trained in the art of courtroom battles, all the rules, procedures, tactical maneuvering, and precedents they need to win their cases in court. Lawyers astonishingly have virtually no training in law school about the art of resolving disputes amicably and fairly.

Step two in how to win a lawsuit: Finding the best lawyer

Here are a few examples of what not to do when looking for the best lawyer for your case:

• Advertisements. In my last blog I advised you where not to go to find the best lawyer – advertisements. See that blog for my reasoning.
• Do not even think about hiring any attorney who contacts you. There are many unscrupulous attorneys who follow police blotters and newspaper articles and make blind calls to those victims offering to represent them. This is unethical in most states, and these people are almost always terrible lawyers.
• Internet searches. This is a very poor tool for finding a good lawyer. I tried looking for a good lawyer in Minneapolis where I have practiced law for 42 years and was unable to develop any search terms or phrases that led me to a list of top-flight attorneys in any given specialty. It appears that most of the lawyers listed have bought their way onto various lists either by paying money to do so or by using tag words in their firm’s literature that causes Google to put their names in the top ten. Occasionally I was able to find a list that did contain a few attorneys who are well respected as top-flight lawyers in their respective specialties, but even then the list did not include many names of people who were at least as good or even better. And those lists also included names of attorneys who are mediocre at best. This tool is clearly not reliable in getting you to the websites of the very best attorneys.
• Lawyers’ organizations – NBTA, ATLA ACTL, DRI, and various state and national bar associations. These are potentially good resources because these groups do have lists of excellent lawyers. Unfortunately, most of these sites do not provide directories of lawyers who are members, so these lists are not accessible to people looking for a lawyer.

Now, let’s talk about what you should do. Keep in mind that the best lawyers get their clients from referrals from two primary sources – happy clients and other lawyers. So that’s where you should start your search.

Step one in how to win a lawsuit: Choose a lawyer

The one question I am constantly asked as a lawyer is: How do I win a lawsuit? So that all of you can benefit from this answer (and also with the hope that less people will be asking it!) I am dedicating the next ten blogs to this subject. This first blog offers my perspectives on how to select a lawyer to represent you.

Perhaps the first question is whether to use a lawyer at all, since court records today indicate that a much larger group of people are choosing to represent themselves. There is an old axiom that “lawyers who represent themselves have a fool for a client.” This axiom is based on the notion that a client is too close to his case, too emotional about his case, too involved in his case to appreciate the risks in the case and fairly and responsibly assess and respond to those risks. I might also ask whether you would feel comfortable diagnosing your own medical complaints, deciding which medications were most appropriate or performing surgery on yourself. Probably not if you care much about your personal health. In fact, there is an enormous difference in the quality of lawyers in the United States. So, the question is not whether to get a lawyer but how to find the best lawyer available.

Let’s start by saying what not to do. Do not, I repeat, do not hire a lawyer based on advertising you have seen. There is absolutely no relationship between lawyers who put out enticing television ads and the level of their legal expertise. Indeed, if there is any relationship at all, it is a negative one. Why is it, one might ask, that a lawyer needs to advertise to stay busy? The vast majority of lawyers do not advertise and instead rely on word of mouth from their current and former clients to refer new clients to their attention. If these lawyers advertised as well, they’d have too much to do.

Then does this mean that lawyers who put their pictures on TV, in newspaper ads and magazine ads don’t have enough clients? But why wouldn’t they have enough clients from referrals from all the clients they have represented in the past? Especially lawyers who advertise almost incessantly...why aren’t all the clients they get from previous ads sending new clients to them? There are only two explanations for this – either they do not have enough clients because they are not very good or they just want to get you into their office and then turn your case over to some other lawyer in their office, someone who does not have enough clients on his own. Trust me on this; I have been trying lawsuits for over 42 years, and far and away the best lawyers I go up against have never advertised once in their lives.

How do you get a GOOD book published?

How likely is it that a well-written novel will actually be published? Here are some interesting statistics...John Grisham’s first novel, A Time to Kill, was declined by 15 publishers and 30 agents (I’ll bet they’re all kicking themselves now). Dr. Seuss’s first book was rejected 24 times. Before he wrote Roots, Alex Haley received 200 rejections. The Good Earth by Pearl Buck was rejected 14 times before it was finally accepted and won a Pulitzer Prize. Louis L’Amour received 200 rejections before he sold his first novel; he then went on to sell over 200 million copies of 112 books. If you visit the House of Happy Walls, Jack London’s estate in Sonoma County, you will see some of his 600 rejection letters.

But here’s my favorite – 8 years after his novel Steps won the National Book Award, Jerzy Kozinski permitted a writer to change his name and the title of the book and send it in manuscript form to 13 agents and 14 publishers just to test the plight of new writers. They all rejected it, including Random House, who had published it originally.

So what’s the lesson to be learned by all this? One thing is certain, do not stop writing for fear of rejection. What if that had been the reaction of any of the great authors mentioned in the last paragraph? What I tell everyone who asks me about my own experience in having my novel The Litigators published (and yes, John Grisham used the same title for his latest book - titles are not protected by copyright laws) is that they need to write for themselves, not for others.