Step eight in how to win a lawsuit: The proper use of interrogatories

Interrogatories are written questions that a party is required to answer under oath. You can ask pretty much anything you want, although many courts restrict the number of interrogatories. The trick here is to remember that, while your opponent is required to sign the answers under oath, it is his lawyer who actually writes out the answers. And lawyers of course are great word smiths who can almost always find evasive ways to answer difficult questions. That’s why I only use interrogatories to gather information that is purely factual: names, addresses, employers, employment history, medical expenses, income reported on tax returns, the identities of all witnesses, the types and identities of all documents that may exist on a given issue, financial information, and the like. I get everything else I need at the deposition of the opposing party where the opponent must answer everything himself and cannot rely on his lawyer to help him respond to difficult questions.

Join me next week as I take a closer look at sensationalized celebrity trials. It will be the first in a new series called Under the Microscope.

Step seven in how to win a lawsuit: Demands for documents

Every United States court permits full discovery, including complete production of all documents that have any potential bearing on the issues before the court. This means that both parties can be required to turn over all documentary evidence (including digital records and e-mails) regardless of whether the evidence supports or harms the other side’s case. The trick is that you have to ask for it in the right way. If you don’t use exactly the right words to describe what you want, you won’t get what you need. The responding lawyer will justify a decision not to produce a record on the basis that it was not properly identified and therefore not properly requested. The converse problem is asking for more than you really need. In this age of digital records and e-mails, a simple request could generate tens of thousands of pages of records and totally inundate you and your lawyer. Lawyers sometimes gladly produce such large volumes of records just to harass the other side or to bury an important document hoping that it might not get found if it is tucked in the middle of thousands of other documents.

Step six in how to win a lawsuit: Depositions

A deposition is when all attorneys require an opposing party or a witness to answer questions under oath in the presence of a court reporter. It is a very formal proceeding, much like testimony in open court, except there is no judge or jury present. Attorneys use this process in order to require witnesses with critical information to commit themselves under oath before trial. This gives both sides an opportunity to plan their responses to the witnesses’ testimony and to avoid surprises at trial. This process is extremely effective in gathering evidence, but it is also very inefficient. In truth, a typical witness with relevant information that could be discovered in a 15-minute phone conversation may be subjected to 4 or 5 hours of intense questioning at a deposition. Because it is so inefficient, it is also extremely expensive. Clients must pay their lawyers to prepare for the deposition; then they must pay them to spend a day at the deposition; then they pay for the court reporter to attend the deposition and type up a lengthy transcript of the proceedings; and then they pay for the lawyers to read and analyze the transcript. It can cost anywhere from $2,000 to $10,000 for a single deposition. Really this is a hugely wasteful endeavor, but it is also an essential one under the rules of discovery in the United States.

Step five in how to win a lawsuit: Controlling your costs

Almost all lawsuits are about money, either winning the best settlement or paying the least settlement. To achieve that goal, the costs you spend litigating the case must be properly controlled – spend too little and you lose the case, spend too much and you still lose because you have not optimized the results you could have obtained. Let me give you some examples. As I mentioned in my last blog, I have defended many cases where a highly skilled and aggressive lawyer for the plaintiff has spent an enormous amount of money building the best possible case he can for his client. Then he comes to me, bragging about all the great evidence he has developed and wants to settle the case. Unfortunately, the lawyer has spent too much, more than his case is worth, so a settlement becomes impossible. Lawyers like these do not understand the meaning of the word “win,” and their clients never win, even if they get a verdict in their favor.

Lawyers representing defendants have their own set of problems. I have actually seen cases where the legal fees spent defending a case far exceed the value of the case itself. I once got a call from a disillusioned client who had received a bill from his lawyer for over $400,000 for defending him successfully on a case where the worst possible result would have required him to pay only $250,000. The lawyer actually sued him for his fee, which is how I got involved. To my astonishment, the lawyer did not even recognize he had done anything wrong. He just kept telling me it was a very complex case with difficult legal issues that required him to expend an enormous amount of time preparing the case properly. Obviously this lawyer does not understand the meaning of the word “win.” The lawyer really thought he had “won” because his client did not have to pay anything to the other side. His client, however, considered the result nothing short of a total disaster.

Step four in how to win a lawsuit: Get the case settled

The biggest mistake most lawyers make is not even trying to get the case settled before they spend a lot of money – your money – preparing the case for trial. Notice that I said “most lawyers,” and I really mean that. Most lawyers in the United States today make this mistake day in and day out, on virtually every case they handle. Lawyers are taught in law school the importance of careful, thorough preparation. They are taught how to use the Rules of Civil Procedure to force the other side to provide every detail about their case, every document that supports their case, every witness who will testify and every piece of evidence they will present in court. So lawyers do everything the rules allow them to do. And that is often very expensive and wasteful.

What I find to be truly amazing is that most lawyers do not even consider discussing settlement until they have spent a lot of money building their case. Nor, for that matter, do the clients themselves. I mostly represent defendants, and in a substantial number of the cases I see, the very first notice my clients receive about a potential claim is when some Deputy Sheriff shows up at their door and serves them with the lawsuit papers. The people bringing these lawsuits, and their lawyers, have never even taken the time to write a letter or call my clients to discuss the nature of their claim.

Why is it that Americans are so intent on running off to their lawyers to resolve all their disputes for them? And why is it that lawyers are so intent on filing a lawsuit and commencing expensive discovery? Isn’t it at least worth a try to get the case settled at the outset? So make your lawyer tells you how he intends to get your case settled and what he can do to get it settled quickly.

I’ve been involved in a lot of cases where it is practically impossible to get the case settled because my opponents have spent too much money building up their cases. If I have a case that is worth $100,000 to my client to get settled, but the other lawyer has already spent $50,000 doing discovery, it is very hard to settle that case.